{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/presentation/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/manifest","@type":"sc:Manifest","label":"Hawaii's Watergate \"tapes\" - the Land Use Commision and leaderships \"weekly reports\"","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35622/full/135%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35622","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"attribution":"University of Hawaii at Manoa Digital Image Collection","related":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/items/show/31295","format":"text/html"},"metadata":[{"label":"Title","value":"Hawaii's Watergate \"tapes\" - the Land Use Commision and leaderships \"weekly reports\""},{"label":"Subject","value":"Hawaii--History--1959-"},{"label":"Creator","value":"Kelly, John"},{"label":"Publisher","value":"Committee on Land Use Decisions"},{"label":"Date","value":"1974-10-21"},{"label":"Format","value":"pamphlet"},{"label":"Type","value":"Image"},{"label":"Extent","value":"8"},{"label":"Full Text","value":"TWO KAUAI community groups fighting rezoning and eviction early this month charged Eddie Tangen, chairman of the state land use commission and Kauai Mayor Francis Ching with back-scenes dealing with a large developer.\\n\\nHawaii state law prohibits commissioners from giving, and developers from receiving assistance on matters before the commission.\\n\\nThe developer is Leadership Housing Inc., tenth largest housing developer in the U. S. Leadership plans a 1,100 acre resort-condo-housing development in Koloa. It would nearly double the population of Kauai.\\n\\nThe page 1 headline news of Tangen's dealing broke in the daily newspapers on Oct. 4 and 5, and in The Garden Island on Oct. 7.\\n\\nBoth Tangen and John Slayter, Leadership's local luna, immediately denied that the commission chairman gave any assistance to Leadership. Ching also issued denials.\\n\\nFour days later, on Oct. 8, and after the public denials of Tangen, Slayter and Ching, the actual texts of Leadership's weekly status reports to Slayter's bosses in Florida were released to the press.\\n\\nOn pages 4 and 5 are printed some of the key charges and denials side by side with the interesting excerpts from Slayter's executive weekly reports, all as quoted in the press. All dates are 1974.\\n\\nThe reader can decide whether these officials seem to be telling the truth to the public or not.\\n\\nPOWERFUL COMMISSION\\n\\nLand is the chief form of wealth in Hawaii.\\n\\nIts use -- whether for growing food or pouring cement, is nearly 1,000 persons  clapped vigorously in rhythm for several minutes in Hawaii's most militant and largest demonstration ever in a land struggle.     This occurred at the Waiahole-Waikane hearing on Oct.  10.\\n\\n_________________________________________________________________\\n\\nStanford Achi, spokesman for the Niumalu-Nawiliwili Tenants Association, called for answers from Tangen as to his assistance given to the developer, Leadership Housing Inc. at the heated Waipahu hearing, controlled by the state land use commission.\\n\\nA single decision by the nine commissioners can make millions in profits for landowners and developers .\\n\\nIt can also result in destruction of prime food-growing lands, evictions of working people from their homes, soaring land taxes, loss of sugar and pine jobs, destruction or takeover of fishing and hunting areas needed by low income people, congestion, rising crime and welfare costs and worsening of the housing crisis.\\n\\nHawaii's housing crisis is already the worst in the nation. It is most severe among low and mid-, die income working people who are practically frozen out of the market.\\n\\nTHE CHAIRMAN'S BIAS\\n\\nMost of the land use commissioners are small businessmen. Two are government bureaucrats. Only one has a significant power base in Hawaii.\\n\\nThat person is Eddie Tangen, commission chairman and a member for the past five years.\\n\\nHe is international representative of the ILWU.\\n\\nEvidence strongly suggests that Tangen has been using his commission position to favor large landowners and developers.\\n\\nConduct of commission hearings under Tangen reveals this trend:\\n\\nAnti-developer speakers have been arbitrarily ruled out of order. Speakers differing with the commission chairman have had their mikes cut off. Developers have been given special advantages in the proceedings . New rules favoring developers and their legalistic methods have been imposed placing farmers, workers and plain people at even a worse disadvantage than before.\\n\\nHearing schedules have been\\n\\n_________________________________________________________________\\n\\ngrossly unfair to working people. Most of the hearings in the present boundary review have begun at 10:30 a.m. when workers and farmers are on their jobs. A few were scheduled at 3 p.m. only because school auditoriums were not available earlier.\\n\\nPublic protest, rather than concern of the commission chairman for the public interests, forced rescheduling of several recent hearings to evening hours.\\n\\nPAID LOBBYISTS\\n\\nThe basic unfairness of the hearings to the people, and their slant to favor developers is shown in another way.\\n\\nDevelopers pay huge fees and salaries to their lawyers, planners and architects and to the lobbyists who speak for them at hearings. The Leadership papers reveal $90,000 to one attorney for a few weeks of \"work\" to present Leadership's case to the Kauai county planning commission.\\n\\nAnother attorney cited a fee of $500,000 to make the land use commission presentation.\\n\\nSuspicion is widespread that huge fees such as these are split with others.\\n\\nMoney to pay such fees comes from high rentals, leases and sales prices.\\n\\nMoreover, the developers usually take months, even years, to work up their plans.\\n\\nUNFAIR TO THE PEOPLE\\n\\nBut Tangen's commission gives farmers and working people who may lose their homes and lifestyle and will be the most affected by rezoning decisions only a few weeks, if that, to prepare their rebuttals.\\n\\nMany affected people only learn of hearings from neighbors and supporters. The commission does no house-to-house canvassing of communities. Official notices are buried on back pages of the newspapers.\\n\\nPrior hearings on appropriations, highways, harbors, airports, and other pre-zoning events are usually unheard of.\\n\\nDevelopment plans are complex. They involve soil conditions, water availability, climate, flood and land runoff, public appropriations, population densities, utilities, taxes, congestion, traffic, highways, and roads, effect on neighboring towns, agriculture, the ocean and the general environment.\\n\\nNeeded studies are often buried in libraries or are non-existent.\\n\\nA big developer may spend several million dollars on land purchases and planning, usually borrowed money, then threaten the government agencies and the public over possible loss if he doesn't get his way.\\n\\nOn the other side, the people, with little or no money for research, planners, lobbyists and attorneys, may not even be told of upcoming hearings.\\n\\nThe whole land use proceeding is grossly unfair to ordinary people who comprise the majority in most of our communities.\\n\\nAs the Leadership papers reveal, part of the developers' lead time is spent brainwashing high public officials and the public, removing obstacles to future commission approval, developing \"good relations\" with key government decision makers, and figuring out how to identify and get around public opposition.\\n\\nHAWAII'S WATERGATE  \"TAPES\"\\n\\nA key to this process is selection of the local attorneys who know the \"inside routes.\" This is the heart of the Leadership scandal.\\n\\nThe Watergate tapes revealed long suspected but previously hard-to-prove penetration of government agencies by big business.\\n\\n_________________________________________________________________\\n\\nStatus Report of June 21, quoted in The Garden Island, Oat. 7: \"On Tuesday, April 22, John Kay and I met with Eddie Tangen at Mr. Tangen's request. Among a number of items brought up by Mr. Tangen, which are giving both John Kay and I some serious thoughts, were the statements that 'a plan for more than 1,000 acres of reclassification to urban use is out of the question' and 'any plan projecting the simultaneous development of two 18 hole golf courses would be considered ridiculous.' Other 'advice' received may best be discussed in detail at our forthcoming meeting May 16.\" [Note: References to Leadership-Tangen meetings are contained in eight separate weekly status reports, April through July].\\n\\nStatus Report of May 3, quoted in The Garden Island, Oct, 7:\\n\\n\"Nevertheless, it has been seriously recommended to us by Eddie Tangen that we employ the services of a 'legal specialist' in preparing presentations to the State Land Use Commission...He had suggested that such a specialist was Mr. - - - of the firm - - - and - - -.\"  (names omitted here since the attorney was not hired)\\n\\nStatus Report of May 17, quoted in The Garden Island, Oct, 7:\\n\\nUnder the heading, \"Professional Representative Before State Land Use\\n\\nCommission:  This question is still somewhat up in the air as the result of new inputs. The second name given to us by Eddie Tangen is a Mr. - - -.\"\\n\\nStatus Report of July 19, quoted in The Garden Island, Oct, 7:\\n\\n\"Since Eddie Tangen remains insistent that a 'Honolulu boy' be retained by leadership to represent them before the State Land Use Commission, and since Mayor Francis Ching remains insistent that a 'Kauai boy\" be retained by Leadership to represent the County of Kauai before the State Land Use Commission a new impasse was created. Clinton Shiraishi held a private meeting between Mayor Francis Ching and Eddie Tangen which has resulted in a new name for the Honolulu representation, Kenneth Saruatari.  (sic. {Note: Shiraishi was hired by Leadership at the recommendation of Mayor Ching.] Status Report of May 17, quoted in The Garden Island, Oct. 7: \"Not only will the Mayor endorse the project, but he also stated that he wishes to actively participate in paving the way for its approval by the State Land Use Commission through personal meetings between himself and Land Use Commission members.\" Status Report of June 7, quoted in The Garden Island, Oat. 7: \"As the result of some strategic planning between myself and Kauai Mayor Francis Ching, a number of citizens testified in favor of the Mayor's economic growth plans through tourism.\"\\n\\n_________________________________________________________________\\n\\nThe Leadership papers reveal the heavy hand of a large developer influencing the attitudes and decisions of local government officials who are supposed to serve the people and the public interest impartially.\\n\\nBETRAYAL REWARD\\n\\nTo landowners and developers, money and profits are everything. Having bought their way into a large piece of Kauai sugar land, having bought the services of \"local\" attorneys, having bought Media Five Architects to try to persuade Kauai citizens to favor a plan that will nearly double the population of the island, having promises of help from the county administration in pressuring the state land use commission, Leadership seemed to be doing just fine.\\n\\nThen came the headlines and the exposure.\\n\\nLeadership is now trying to buy out the opposition. For the past week, Leadership has advertised a $5,000 reward for information as to how and where their executive papers got leaked.\\n\\nIt is evident that Leadership executives feel that money can even buy betrayal of the people fighting for their jobs, homes and lifestyle.\\n\\nBut the people believe otherwise,\\n\\nWHAT ABOUT AN INVESTIGATION?\\n\\nPublic exposure of the above facts should naturally lead to investigation and accountability of the role of these public officials.\\n\\nIf the governor, state and county agencies do not act to make these officials answer questions many people are asking, then new questions arise:\\n\\nIs the Leadership-Tangen-Ching scandal just the tip of another iceberg?\\n\\nIs a Watergate-style cover-up being planned or already in effect?\\n\\nEnough evidence has been published in the local press for investigating bodies to begin their own research.  Over two weeks have gone by. Why the deafening silence?\\n\\nWho does silence protect in this election period?\\n\\nMeanwhile, a cloud hangs over all decisions of the land use commission while under Tangen's chairmanship.\\n\\nThe same will be true for any decisions announced in December covering the present 5-year boundary review.\\n\\nIs the continued rape of Hawaii's people, land and sea by giant corporations with the aid of certain government officials to continue unchecked?\\n\\nThese questions beg for answers.\\n\\nOne project alone would put a city half the size of present Honolulu -- Waikiki resort hotels, concrete jungles and all -- in the irreplaceable sugarcane land of Ewa.\\n\\nIt would be a city of 300,000 NEW residents!\\n\\nThat is the scope of the insane profit hunger today of big developers, banks, landowners and mortgage agencies, in short, the entire commercial world -- those that built Waikiki, and are cementing over our islands.\\n\\nSUGAR PROFITS VERSUS URBAN PROFITS\\n\\nThis past week, world sugar prices were driven higher than ever making unprecedented profits for sugar producers.  That is due to rising demand and short supply.\\n\\nHawaii's sugar producers will make even more profits by converting additional sugar land to urban use, strange as this may seem.\\n\\n_________________________________________________________________\\n\\nThat is because curtailed production will continue to raise sugar prices still higher in obedience to an economic \"law\" under near monopoly conditions.\\n\\nIt is also because Hawaii's old \"big five\" sugar corporations are now interlocked with multi-national corporations involved in worldwide urban developments, similar to Kauai's Grove Farm and Leadership Housing Inc.\\n\\nHighrise congestion produces higher profits from the land than agricultural production.\\n\\nSugar producers can make plenty profits in sugar, but their parent companies make even more profits in highrise construction and urban development'.\\n\\nUnless controlled by Hawaii's people, these economic forces will eventually pave over most of the islands' accessible land.\\n\\nGovernment agencies captured by this corporate monster cannot be relied upon to apply restraints.\\n\\nThat is why Hawaii's corporations and government officials like Eddie Tangen are all out for continued urban \"growth.\"\\n\\nAlso, service industry wages such as hotels and laundries in Hawaii are only half those-of sugar and pine wages.\\n\\nHotels are therefore more profitable than agriculture, for their owners. The same is true for condominiums , which, once built, employ very little labor.\\n\\nA LIBERAL MASK\\n\\nThe individuals who benefit the most from these rezoning decisions are Hawaii's highly paid corporate executives.\\n\\nWhy is it, however, that none of them sit on the key state land use commission?\\n\\n*1970 average weekly wages: hotels, $79; sugar & pine, $145.\\n\\nWhy are we not asked to testify at these hearings before Amfac's Henry Walker, Dillingham's Herbert Cornuelle, Castle & Cooke's Malcomb McNaughton, Loyalty Enterprise's Clarence Ching, Campbell Estate's Fred Trotter, McCandless Estate's Mrs. Lester Marks, or developers Herbert Horita or Joe Pao, all of whom are among the leading beneficiaries of urban development?\\n\\nIs it because these millionaire corporate executives, large landowners and developers would be easily exposed?  Is it because they have others to do this messy work for them, others with a liberal \"people's representative\" image?  People like Eddie Tangen of the ILWU, who claims to speak for the best interests of workers, or Shelley Mark and Sunao Kido, liberal democrats of the Burns administration (assuming the other commissioners are just window dressing)?\\n\\nThat these liberal \"faces\" are doing the work of the big landowners, developers, bankers and suppliers, is shown in a recent university study of land use commission decisions since the commission was formed ten years ago.\\n\\nThe study shows that while up-zoning (urban) under the land use law is supposed to be based on \"need\", commission decisions are not based on need. They are arbitrary .\\n\\nThe study shows a strong 10-year trend toward urban rezoning favorable to the largest landowners and developers.\\n\\n\"The approval rate for large petitions was higher (83.9%) than for all petitions...\"\\n\\nHULI\\n\\n_________________________________________________________________\\n\\nMany plantation workers, members of Tangen's ILWU, strongly protested the rezoning applications. At Ewa, ILWU officials coached members in pro-developer testimonies.\\n\\nTHE FACTS AND OPINIONS in this brochure are widely held. The Leadership exposure confirms many suspicions.  Watergate is all around us.  But what of the response of the people? A single illustration provides the answer:  In 1968, a hearing of the City Planning Commission was held on Oahu over a rezoning petition for a large tract of land at Koko Head. Many hundreds of farmers, residents, flower growers and others would be evicted.  How many came to the hearing? Only one'. Not even the developer's agent showed up, so cut-and-dried was the procedure.  Labor leader Arthur Rutledge moved to approve. It was passed without \npposition and a main phase of Hawaii Kai was begun.  The people did not know of the hearing and were unaware they could fight back.  Today, six years later, thousands throughout the state are on the march.  Many projects worth millions in profits to developers have been stalled or stopped dead in their tracks by the aroused people.   The lesson is clear.  IN UNITY THERE IS STRENGTH -- FIGHT BACK AND WE CAN WIN!  THE PEOPLE SHALL DECIDE THEIR OWN FUTURE!"}],"sequences":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/sequence/normal","@type":"sc:Sequence","label":"Current Page Order","viewingDirection":"left-to-right","viewingHint":"paged","canvases":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p1","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-570medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35621/full/140%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35621","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2052,"height":2927,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0001-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35621/full/561%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2052,"height":2927,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35621","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p1"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p2","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-573medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35622/full/135%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35622","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":1996,"height":2955,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0002-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35622/full/540%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":1996,"height":2955,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35622","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p2"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p3","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-576medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35623/full/139%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35623","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2059,"height":2962,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0003-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35623/full/556%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2059,"height":2962,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35623","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p3"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p4","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-579medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35624/full/142%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35624","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2087,"height":2948,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0004-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35624/full/566%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2087,"height":2948,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35624","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p4"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p5","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-582medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35625/full/139%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35625","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2059,"height":2962,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0005-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35625/full/556%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2059,"height":2962,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35625","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p5"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p6","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-585medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35626/full/140%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35626","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2038,"height":2913,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0006-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35626/full/560%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2038,"height":2913,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35626","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p6"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p7","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-588medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35627/full/143%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35627","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2073,"height":2899,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0007-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35627/full/572%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2073,"height":2899,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35627","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p7"}]},{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p8","@type":"sc:Canvas","label":"78-591medium.jpg","thumbnail":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35628/full/139%2C200/0/default.jpg","service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35628","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"width":2045,"height":2948,"images":[{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/annotation/p0008-image","@type":"oa:Annotation","motivation":"sc:painting","resource":{"@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35628/full/555%2C800/0/default.jpg","@type":"dctypes:Image","format":"image/jpeg","width":2045,"height":2948,"service":{"@context":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/context.json","@id":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif-img/35628","profile":"http://iiif.io/api/image/2/level2.json"}},"on":"https://digital.library.manoa.hawaii.edu/iiif/31295/canvas/p8"}]}]}]}